Semiotic of action: textualization and notation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35494/topsem.2015.1.33.227Keywords:
enunciation, text, practice, textualization, notationAbstract
Our essay focuses on some epistemological and methodological issues concerning the semiotic that were not solved yet, mainly the questions related to the more or less pertinent instruments according to analysis of the semiotic practices. We will initially retrace the debate about the epistemological relationship between text and action, outlining the forms of enunciative praxis through different levels of pertinence analysis (e.g. utterance, enunciation).
Secondly, we propose the concept of “textualization” as mediation between text and action (photographs, videos, notes) that organizes and represents practices, which are in themselves ephemeral and elusive. Finally, it seeks investigation of that we call “notation”. This analytical form of mediation between text and practice works like an ex-post reconstruction of practices, which highlights the patterns of gestures and exchanges.
A more general aim of this essay is an enquiry into the legitimate objects of semiotics by means this question: what are the objects that semiotics can analyze without betraying its principle of immanence, but also without being confined to texts and, as a consequence, being unable to respond to topical questions on social issues.
Downloads
References
ANGENOT, Valérie; Dondero, Maria Giulia; Guillaume Joachim & Shima Shirkhodaei (2003). « Sémiotique de la communication en coprésence et à distance. Du textualisme à la sémiotique des pratiques », en Interfaces numériques, vol. 2, núm. 3, pp. 531-567.
___________ BASSO FOSSALI, Pierluigi. “Testo, pratiche, immanenza”. Semiotiche, núm. 5. Disponible en: http://www.fonurgia.unito.it/ andrea/pub/semiotiche5.pdf
___________ & Maria Giulia Dondero (2011). Sémiotique de la photographie. Limoges : Pulim.
BORDRON, Jean-François (2011). L’iconicité et ses images. París : puf.
BOUDON, Pierre (2011). Disponible en: http://epublications.unilim.fr/ revues/as/862
DONDERO, Maria Giulia (2011). Actes Sémiotiques. Disponible en: http://epublications.unilim.fr/revues/as/840
___________ (2013a). « Rhétorique et énonciation visuelle ». Visible núm. 10. Chatenet & Mattozzi (dirs.), pp. 9-31.
___________ (2013b). « Rhétorique et visualisation scientifique ». Visible núm. 10. Chatenet & Mattozzi (dirs.), pp. 9-31.
___________ et Jacques Fontanille (2012). Des images à problèmes. Le sens du visuel à l’épreuve de l’image scientifique. Limoges : pulim.
ECO, Umberto (1975). Trattato di semiotica generale. Milán: Bompiani.
___________ (2013 [1984]). Sémiotique et philosophie du langage. París : puf.
FLOCH, Jean-Marie (1993 [1990]). « Ête-vous arpenteurs ou somnambules? L’élaboration d’une typologie comportementale des voyageurs du métro ». Sémiotique, Marketing et Comunication. París : puf, pp. 19-48 [Versión en español: “¿Es usted agrimensor o sonámbulo? Semiótica, marketing y comunicación. Bajo los signos las estrategias. Barcelona/Buenos Aires/México, Paidós Comunicación, 1993, pp. 37-53].
FONTANILLE, Jacques (1989). Les espaces subjectifs. Introduction à une sémiotique de l’observateur. París : Hachette.
___________ (2008). Pratiques sémiotiques. París : puf.
___________ et Claude Zilberberg (1998). Tension et signification. Lieja : Mardaga.
GOODMAN, Nelson (1968). Languages of Art. London: Bobbs Merrill [Versión en francés: Langages de l’art. Une approche de la théorie des symboles, tr. fr. J. Morizot, París, Hachette, 2005].
GOODWIN, Charles (1994). “Professional vision”, en American Anthropologist, vol. 96, núm. 3, pp. 606-633.
____________ (1997). “The Blackness of Black: Colour Categories as Situated Practice”. En Resnick Lauren B., Säljö Roger, Pontecorvo Clotilde, Burge Barbara (eds.). Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition. Berlín-Heidelberg-Nueva York: Springer. Disponible en: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/clic/ cgoodwin/97black.pdf
___________ (2000). “Pratices of Seeing: Visual Analysis. An Ethnomethodological Approach”. En Van Leeuwen, Theo & Jewitt Carey (eds.). Handbook of Visual Analysis. Londres: Sage Publications, pp. 157-182. Disponible en: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/clic/ cgoodwin/00pract_see.pdf
___________ (2003). Il senso del vedere. Roma: Meltemi. Disponible en: http://www.ec-aiss.it/biblioteca/biblioteca.php
GREIMAS, Algirdas Julien et Joseph Courtés (1979). Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. París : Hachette.
HUTCHINS, Edwin (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: mit Press.
KAUFFMAN, Jean-Claude (1996). L’entretien compréhensif. París : Nathan.
MANETTI, Giovanni (1998). La teoria dell’enunciazione. Le origini del concetto e alcuni più recenti sviluppi. Siena: Protagon.
MARRONE, Gianfranco (2010). L’invenzione del testo. Una nuova critica della cultura. Roma/Bari: Laterza.
METZ, Christian (1991). L’énonciation impersonnelle ou le site du film. París : Klincksieck.
MONDADA, Lorenza (2005). Chercheurs en interaction. Comment émergent les savoirs. Lausana : Presses Polytechniques y Universitaires Romandes.
PAOLUCCI, Claudio (2010). Strutturalismo e interpretazione. Milán: Bompiani.
SUCHMAN, Lucy (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human/Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
VIOLI, Patrizia (2006). “Il soggetto è negli avverbi. Lo spazio della soggettività nella teoria semiotica di Umberto Eco”. E/C Rivista dell’AISS Associazione Italiana di Studi Semiotici.
THEUREAU, Jacques. Disponible en: http://www.coursdaction.fr/accueil.htm http://139.165.65.76/common.ulg.ac.be/web/app_dev.php http://www.ulg.ac.be/cms/c_147500/fr/lucid-presente-le-studio-digitalcollaboratif.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Tópicos del Seminario is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional License.
